The Russian Federation, one of the world’s major regional powers, a founding member of the United Nations, and a central actor in the international system, has played a complex and evolving role in shaping global geopolitics. During the Cold War and the era of bipolar global order, Russia (as the Soviet Union) stood firmly on the Eastern bloc’s side, confronting the West. Russian political history is marked by significant turbulence and transformation. From the days of the Tsarist Russian Empire in the 19th century when it entered fierce rivalry with the British Empire across regions such as Central Asia, Afghanistan, Iran, and Tibet, in what came to be known as the “Great Game” to its influence over the Ottoman Empire, the Persian Gulf, and parts of Europe, the geopolitical footprint of Russia has always been deeply felt.
Following the October Revolution of 1917, the Soviet Union emerged, replacing the Tsarist regime with a communist system. After the Soviet collapse in 1991, Russia embarked on a new path, adopting a market economy and pursuing democratization in an attempt to secure its position within the evolving global order. This transition began under President Boris Yeltsin, who sought to stabilize post-Soviet Russia through economic reforms and an emphasis on democracy, the rule of law, and human rights.
Despite Yeltsin’s efforts to align with the West, his tenure was marred by political instability, a constitutional crisis, and brutal wars in Chechnya. These factors significantly eroded both domestic and international legitimacy. Under increasing internal pressure, Yeltsin resigned at the end of 1999 and handed power to Vladimir Putin, who had recently been appointed Prime Minister. Putin entered the political arena to restore Russia’s global power and prestige. While his policies lack the ideological framework of the Soviet era, restoring Russia’s lost status on the world stage has remained a core objective. Although the former Soviet republics have declared independence, Russia continues to view these countries as part of its traditional sphere of influence. In this context, the twenty-year presence of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan was perceived as a direct threat to Russian national security.
In response, Russia adopted a tactical approach in engaging with and strengthening the Taliban. Following the U.S. withdrawal, Russia saw one of its key geopolitical goals realized. Over the past four years, Moscow’s relationship with the Taliban has been marked by a pragmatic warmth, occasionally tempered by strategic hesitation. As Ibrahim Bahiss, a researcher on Afghan affairs, noted in an analysis published on the International Crisis Group’s website (July 4, 2025), Russia’s decision in April 2025 to remove the Taliban from its official list of designated terrorist organizations represented a major milestone in this evolving relationship. According to the report, Zamir Kabulov, Russia’s special envoy for Afghanistan, called for military support to the Taliban in their fight against what he termed “hotbeds of international terrorism.” Kabulov also announced that Taliban representatives would participate as full members in the upcoming Moscow Format meeting, a regional dialogue platform focused on Afghanistan.
Russia’s security and geopolitical concerns, especially along its Central Asian borders that neighbor Afghanistan, play a critical role in shaping its regional doctrine. The repeated invitations extended to the Taliban to attend international economic forums in St. Petersburg between 2022 and 2024 signaled a notable shift in Moscow’s approach toward the group. While Russia’s current engagement with the Taliban is interest-driven and tactical, it is largely shaped by pressing security anxieties, including the trafficking of narcotics and the presence of terrorist groups near the Central Asian frontiers. According to an analysis by Giuliano Bifolchi, founder of the think tank Special Eurasia, citing senior Kremlin officials, some of Russia’s recent steps toward legitimizing the Taliban reflect a broader strategy to expand its influence in South and Central Asia and to reshape the region’s power dynamics. Though these moves have not sparked significant domestic opposition within Russia, they align seamlessly with the country’s pragmatic foreign policy and strategic doctrine.
As such, Russia’s security doctrine views building and strengthening ties with the Taliban as a necessary step toward mitigating cross-border threats to its national security. While Russian officials initially expressed serious concerns about the Taliban’s return to power—particularly the risk of Afghanistan once again becoming a haven for terrorist organizations—Russia’s primary worry has centered on the Islamic State’s Khorasan branch (ISIS-K). Additionally, given that Russia is directly engaged in a war in Ukraine, it seeks to avoid opening another front against extremist groups along its southern borders. In light of these geopolitical developments, it appears that Russia’s diplomatic engagement with the Taliban has paved the way for other regional powers to consider similar approaches. Speculation is now mounting that countries such as China, the United Arab Emirates, Türkiye, Pakistan, Iran, and Central Asian states—including Uzbekistan, which previously remarked that recognizing the Taliban was “inevitable”—may soon follow Moscow’s lead. These developments could have a direct impact on the status of Afghanistan’s current representation at the United Nations, as one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council—with veto power—has now effectively recognized Taliban rule. This poses a serious challenge to the fragile international consensus that has, until now, resisted granting formal recognition to the Taliban as leverage for political and human rights reforms.
While the political, economic, and human rights crises in Afghanistan—particularly the Taliban’s ban on women’s education and employment—remain top concerns for the international community and the United Nations, the Taliban have nevertheless made measurable progress in forging relations with neighboring and regional states. According to an analytical memo published on February 5, 2025, by Hamid Hakimi, a researcher with the Asia-Pacific and Europe Programs at Chatham House, the Taliban have managed to navigate regional diplomacy with some success. In September 2024, the Taliban’s Foreign Ministry claimed to have dispatched 11 diplomats to various countries. Since returning to power in August 2021, the Taliban have maintained warm relations with Russia while also managing to preserve balanced ties with India, a key regional player.
This leads to the central question: Why has Russia chosen to officially recognize the Taliban nearly four years after they seized power? While multiple answers have been proposed, several fundamental points are worth noting:
First, Russia understands and has long understood that the Taliban came to power under the framework of the Doha Agreement and that their continued rule is entangled with U.S. interests in the region. However, nearly four years on, Russian officials now believe that the Taliban can serve as a buffer force against threats emanating from the borders of Central Asia. Within the framework of Russia’s security and economic doctrine, recognizing the Taliban allows Moscow to keep the group within its sphere of influence. This, in turn, reduces the financial and logistical burden of managing terrorism and narcotics trafficking along its southern frontier.
Second, Russia and the Central Asian states view Afghanistan—and more broadly, South Asia as an essential economic market. Formal recognition of the Taliban facilitates easier access to this region. Economic development is one of President Vladimir Putin’s core priorities for restoring Russia’s international stature. Beyond security concerns, Moscow is actively pursuing economic engagement with the Taliban. Russian officials have repeatedly emphasized that using Afghanistan as a transit corridor for exporting natural gas to India and transporting other goods to Pakistani ports would be a strategic move. Within this framework, the extension of gas pipelines through Afghanistan’s mountainous terrain and the expansion of the rail network, which currently ends at the Uzbekistan border, are integral components of Moscow’s broader economic strategy. At the same time, China’s financial investments and its backing of the Taliban, particularly in exchange for access to Afghanistan’s natural resources, may eventually result in a collision of interests between the two powers. Such a scenario could challenge China’s growing presence in Afghanistan in the long term.
Third, Russia had initially assumed that anti-Taliban opposition groups based abroad might receive significant support and challenge the group’s rule. However, nearly four years into Taliban control, these groups have failed to establish a cohesive or unified front. The only consistent and visible opposition has come from Afghan women, who have taken to the streets in protest since the Taliban’s return to power.
A recent analysis of Russia’s decision to recognize the Taliban draws parallels between the post-Doha developments in Afghanistan and the trajectory of Syria under Bashar al-Assad. Observers argue that Afghanistan may follow a similar path, particularly in the case of governments that have emerged under militia control, such as the Taliban regime. Based on international legal standards, especially the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Russia’s recognition of the Taliban could ultimately undermine global norms concerning the legitimacy of governments. It risks setting a dangerous precedent, potentially emboldening armed groups around the world to seek legitimacy and power through force rather than political consensus.
In conclusion, Moscow’s evolving stance toward the Taliban reflects its broader security and economic calculus and plays a decisive role in shaping the emerging regional order in Central Asia. This shift is also symptomatic of Washington’s indecisiveness and lack of a coherent strategy on Afghanistan. It underscores the urgent need for the United States to reassess and recalibrate its Afghanistan policy in light of Russia’s assertive diplomacy and expanding influence in the region.
You can read the Persian version of this analysis here:
دکترین جدید روسیه چه نقشی در رسمیتبخشی به طالبان ایفا کرده است؟
